A Privacy Revolution or a Market Power Play?
User acquisition costs increased significantly post-ATT, with some advertisers reporting a 20–30% rise in Cost Per Install (CPI) on iOS. That’s exactly what happened when Apple introduced App Tracking Transparency (ATT) in April 2021.
Designed to give users control over their data, ATT requires iOS apps to obtain explicit consent before tracking user activity across different apps and websites. While Apple positioned this as a win for privacy, the gaming industry faced soaring marketing costs, reduced ad efficiency, and a major shakeup in user acquisition strategies.
Now, three years later, ATT is facing its biggest regulatory challenge yet. France’s antitrust watchdog is preparing a landmark fine that could force Apple to scrap ATT in the country — potentially the first major regulatory veto of the policy. With Germany and the European Commission also circling, Apple’s dominance over mobile advertising is under scrutiny like never before.
This article breaks down the facts: how ATT reshaped mobile gaming, what the data tells us, and whether regulators are about to force a major shift in Apple’s strategy.
The Immediate Effect on Mobile Gaming
Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) fundamentally altered the way mobile games acquire, monetize, and retain users. By limiting access to the Identifier for Advertisers (IDFA) — previously the backbone of mobile marketing — ATT forced game developers to adapt or struggle. The effects were immediate and widespread, particularly in three areas: declining ad revenue, rising user acquisition costs, and a shift in platform strategies.
1. Decline in Ad Revenue and In-App Purchases
For years, mobile games thrived on data-driven advertising. Free-to-play titles relied on precise user tracking to optimize ad targeting and boost in-app purchases (IAPs). ATT disrupted this model overnight.
- Many mobile game developers saw a decline in in-app purchase revenue post-ATT, though exact figures vary by publisher and region.
- Meta (Facebook), a key advertising channel for mobile games, lost $10 billion in ad revenue in 2022 due to reduced ad efficiency caused by ATT.
- Games have the highest ATT opt-in rate among app categories, averaging around 39%.
The result? Many game studios saw lower revenues, higher customer acquisition costs, and reduced ad performance. The era of fine-tuned, hyper-targeted advertising for mobile gaming had come to an end.
2. Rising Costs of User Acquisition
With IDFA unavailable for most users, mobile game publishers faced an immediate spike in customer acquisition costs (CAC). Without personalized targeting, many games had to spend more to acquire the same number of users — or accept fewer players for the same budget.
- The cost per install (CPI) for iOS games increased post-ATT, with reports estimating a 20–30% rise in some cases.
- Advertisers reported significant declines in click-through rates (CTR) for conversion-optimized ads post-ATT, with some estimates suggesting a substantial drop.
- Some publishers reported spending 50% more to generate the same number of paying users compared to pre-ATT levels.
This sudden rise in advertising inefficiency forced many mobile game developers to explore new growth strategies, including alternative ad platforms, influencer partnerships, and organic community building.
3. Shift to Android and Alternative Ad Strategies
With iOS user tracking severely restricted, advertisers diverted budgets to platforms where targeted advertising remained effective — most notably Android.
- Some advertisers shifted budgets to Android as iOS targeting became more difficult, contributing to a relative increase in Android game installs.
- Publishers increasingly turned to hybrid monetization models, such as subscriptions and engagement-based ads, to make up for revenue losses.
- Server-to-server (S2S) ad attribution emerged as a privacy-compliant alternative to IDFA, though adoption remains limited.
In response to ATT, gaming companies began rethinking how they engage players, investing more in first-party data collection, live operations, and retention strategies rather than pure ad-driven growth.
Apple’s Growing Advertising Business
While ATT forced mobile game developers and advertisers to adapt to a more expensive, less efficient user acquisition landscape, Apple’s own advertising business flourished. The restrictions on IDFA made alternative ad solutions — particularly Apple’s proprietary ad network — far more attractive. This has led to accusations of self-preferencing and regulatory scrutiny into whether ATT was a privacy-driven policy or a strategic move to strengthen Apple’s grip on mobile advertising.
1. Apple’s Search Ads Surge
Apple’s Search Ads, which allow developers to promote their apps within the App Store, experienced explosive growth post-ATT. With fewer effective alternatives, advertisers had little choice but to rely on Apple’s ad platform, even as costs climbed.
- Apple’s Search Ads business saw rapid growth post-ATT, as advertisers increasingly relied on it for iOS user acquisition.
- By early 2024, Apple controlled over 50% of mobile app advertising on iOS, a dramatic increase from its pre-ATT levels.
- The cost-per-tap (CPT) for Search Ads doubled, further reinforcing Apple’s dominance as the best-performing ad option on iOS.
For game developers, this created a pay-to-play system where Apple’s own ad platform became the most effective way to acquire users on iOS — at significantly higher costs.
2. The Shift to First-Party Data & Apple’s Advantage
With ATT blocking access to third-party tracking, the industry saw a pivot toward first-party data strategies — an area where Apple had a built-in advantage.
- Apple retains exclusive access to App Store browsing behavior, download trends, and Apple ID-linked data, giving it powerful insights unavailable to third-party advertisers.
- Unlike competitors, Apple can use on-device data processing (which bypasses ATT restrictions) to optimize ad targeting.
- Its Privacy-Preserving Ad Measurement (PPAM) framework offers an alternative to third-party tracking while keeping ad data within Apple’s ecosystem.
This raised concerns that Apple was not only restricting ad tracking but also strengthening its own ability to sell targeted advertising — without competition.
3. Regulatory Scrutiny: Privacy or Market Control?
As Apple’s ad business expanded, regulators began questioning whether ATT was a legitimate privacy move — or an anticompetitive tactic.
- France’s Autorité de la Concurrence opened an antitrust investigation in 2023, citing concerns that ATT disadvantages third-party advertisers while benefiting Apple.
- Germany’s Bundeskartellamt launched a similar inquiry, stating that Apple’s dual role as both platform owner and ad seller raises serious competition concerns.
- According to Reuters (2025), France’s regulator is reportedly considering a fine of up to 10% of Apple’s global revenue and may force changes to ATT enforcement.
The European Commission’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) could further limit Apple’s control over app tracking and advertising rules, setting the stage for potential regulatory interventions across the EU.
Regulatory Challenges to ATT
Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) has triggered a wave of antitrust scrutiny across Europe, with France leading the charge. Regulators argue that ATT, while framed as a privacy measure, has restricted competition in mobile advertising, forcing businesses to spend more on Apple’s own ad services. If France follows through with a fine and possible ban on ATT, it could set a precedent for wider regulatory action across the EU.
1. France’s Antitrust Investigation
France’s Autorité de la Concurrence has been investigating Apple since 2023, questioning whether ATT distorts the mobile ad market. The case hinges on the argument that Apple’s policy restricts third-party advertisers while boosting its own ad revenue.
- In March 2025, reports surfaced that France’s regulator is preparing a fine of up to 10% of Apple’s global revenue and may order Apple to stop enforcing ATT in the country.
- The investigation found that ATT made it more expensive and difficult for advertisers to operate on iOS, disproportionately harming smaller businesses.
- Critics argue that Apple has exempted itself from its own privacy rules by using on-device ad tracking for its Search Ads and App Store recommendations.
If France forces Apple to repeal or modify ATT, it would be the first regulatory veto against Apple’s privacy policies, potentially reshaping digital advertising across Europe.
2. Germany and the European Commission Join the Battle
France is not alone in its scrutiny of ATT. Germany’s Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt) and the European Commission are conducting parallel investigations, with Apple facing increasing regulatory pressure.
- Germany’s regulator has raised concerns that Apple is using ATT to weaken competitors while strengthening its own market power.
- The European Commission’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), which came into force in 2023, is designed to curb the power of digital “gatekeepers” like Apple. The DMA could force Apple to open iOS tracking frameworks to other ad networks, creating a more level playing field.
- If EU regulators align with France’s stance, Apple could face a broader crackdown on ATT enforcement across all EU member states.
The European regulatory framework is evolving quickly, and Apple’s privacy policies may need to undergo significant changes to comply with new digital competition laws.
3. What Happens If ATT Is Banned in France?
If France forces Apple to remove ATT, the decision would have wide-reaching implications.
- Developers and advertisers would regain access to IDFA, restoring previous ad-tracking capabilities within France.
- User acquisition costs could decrease, making mobile advertising more affordable for businesses operating in the French market.
- Apple might be forced to offer alternative tracking frameworks, either regionally (for France) or across Europe, if regulators demand further compliance.
A France-only ban on ATT would create fragmentation within the EU digital ad market, potentially influencing other regulators to push for broader reforms.
The Future of ATT in Gaming
The gaming industry has been at the forefront of the ATT-driven transformation, facing rising user acquisition costs, declining ad efficiency, and an evolving regulatory landscape. As Apple defends its privacy-first approach while regulators challenge its dominance, the future of ATT remains uncertain. Whether Apple modifies, expands, or is forced to roll back ATT will significantly impact how game developers and advertisers operate.
1. A Potential ATT Rollback?
With France’s potential fine and ban, Apple may be forced to rethink ATT enforcement — either by modifying the policy or creating regional exceptions.
- If France forces Apple to disable ATT, it would reopen access to IDFA for advertisers in the country.
- If the European Commission enforces stricter rules, Apple may need to offer alternatives to ATT, ensuring fair competition in mobile advertising.
- In a worst-case scenario for Apple, a broader EU-wide ruling could weaken ATT’s effectiveness and limit Apple’s control over ad tracking.
While Apple has resisted regulatory pressure, the company has a history of adjusting policies in response to legal challenges (e.g., App Store payment policies in South Korea and the Netherlands).
2. The Industry Shift Toward Privacy-First Advertising
Even if regulators force changes to ATT, the privacy-driven ad ecosystem is here to stay. Game developers and advertisers are already adapting to a post-tracking world by focusing on:
- Contextual advertising: Targeting users based on real-time app interactions rather than personal tracking.
- First-party data collection: Encouraging players to opt in to personalized experiences through direct sign-ups, subscriptions, and in-game engagement.
- Privacy-focused attribution models: Using on-device tracking, server-to-server (S2S) ad attribution, and Apple’s SKAdNetwork instead of traditional user-level tracking.
Many major game publishers have already reduced their reliance on IDFA tracking, developing sustainable ad models that don’t depend on third-party data access.
3. The Rise of Alternative Platforms
With iOS becoming more restrictive, advertisers have shifted focus to other platforms, including:
- Android, where Google’s privacy policies are less restrictive than ATT (for now).
- PC & Console platforms, where ad tracking is less of a challenge, and premium game monetization models remain dominant.
- Web-based gaming, where developers can build cross-platform experiences that aren’t tied to Apple’s ad ecosystem.
If ATT remains unchanged, more advertisers and game developers may diversify away from iOS, reducing Apple’s dominance in mobile gaming.
Apple’s Privacy Strategy at a Crossroads
Apple’s App Tracking Transparency was one of the most significant policy shifts in mobile advertising history. While it has strengthened privacy protections, it has also made user acquisition more expensive, created market advantages for Apple, and triggered regulatory pushback.
The coming months will determine:
✅ Will France’s ruling set a precedent for ATT’s rollback?
✅ Will Apple modify ATT to comply with European regulations?
✅ How will game developers continue adapting to a privacy-first world?
As competition authorities, advertisers, and developers push back, Apple faces a critical choice: maintain ATT as-is and risk further fines, or evolve its privacy policies to comply with global antitrust pressures. Whatever happens next, the mobile gaming industry must prepare for continued disruption.
The gaming industry is changing fast. Are you keeping up?
Every day, I — Reinout te Brake — track gaming trends, analyze market shifts, and speak with industry leaders. My goal? To give you real insights — data-driven, strategic, and always ahead of the curve.
If you found this piece valuable, I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments.
But, Tap the clap 👏 button 50 times or more if you enjoyed my story! It would help me to get more visibility for my article.
And if you want more, check out my curated reading list of must-read articles on gaming.
Want to stay ahead of the game? Follow me on LinkedIn for deep insights and industry analysis, or subscribe to our newsletter.
Reinout’s Personal Thoughts
Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) has fundamentally reshaped the mobile advertising and gaming landscape, affecting user acquisition costs, ad revenue, and competition. While Apple defends ATT as a pro-privacy initiative, its broader impact has sparked regulatory investigations, market shifts, and legal challenges across Europe.
- User acquisition costs surged, with some advertisers reporting a 20–30% increase in Cost Per Install (CPI) as IDFA-based tracking became obsolete.
- Global in-app purchase revenue dropped, with game developers being among the most affected as ad-driven monetization became less effective.
- Games have the highest ATT opt-in rate among app categories (39%), yet advertisers still struggle with limited tracking capabilities and reduced ad efficiency.
- Apple’s Search Ads business grew rapidly post-ATT, with advertisers increasingly forced to rely on it due to fewer alternative targeting options.
- France’s regulator is considering a fine of up to 10% of Apple’s global revenue, and potential enforcement actions may require Apple to adjust or roll back ATT in the country.
- The European Commission’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) aims to limit the power of tech gatekeepers, directly impacting Apple’s ability to control app tracking and advertising rules.
- Epic Games has launched a rival app store in the EU, leveraging DMA regulations to break Apple’s dominance over iOS app distribution — marking a significant shift in platform control.
With France, Germany, and the EU intensifying regulatory scrutiny, Apple faces growing pressure to modify or justify ATT’s competitive impact. Whether Apple adapts its policies, fights back against enforcement, or finds alternative solutions, the outcome will have far-reaching implications for mobile gaming, advertising, and digital competition worldwide.
The coming months will be critical in determining whether ATT remains a cornerstone of Apple’s privacy push or becomes a flashpoint for antitrust actions that reshape the digital ecosystem.
